|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 29, 2014 14:49:12 GMT -6
Does anyone's girlfriend think they are weird, crazy, obsessed and possibly gay because they care about fashion and jeans so much? No, but my wife does.
|
|
|
Post by brentkuz on Dec 29, 2014 20:58:50 GMT -6
Does anyone's girlfriend think they are weird, crazy, obsessed and possibly gay because they care about fashion and jeans so much? No, but my wife does. Same difference. At least I'm not alone. Both my mom and dad always were well dressed. Mix that with my grandfathers old school 60's style. It rubbed off.
|
|
|
Post by univibe88 on Dec 30, 2014 10:23:19 GMT -6
My family thinks it's pretty bonkers. But then again, soaking in a tub whilst wearing jeans is on the long list of bonkers things that I do. So nothing really surprises them anymore.
|
|
|
Post by wisdom on Dec 30, 2014 12:31:26 GMT -6
Loomies soaked in Kakishibu after a few days of sun exposure.. color's a lot more apparent now, but may still go for a 2nd dip.
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 30, 2014 20:17:06 GMT -6
For those of you who've done The Soak already, how much inseam length did you lose?
|
|
|
Post by jray on Dec 30, 2014 20:20:15 GMT -6
Same difference. At least I'm not alone. Both my mom and dad always were well dressed. Mix that with my grandfathers old school 60's style. It rubbed off. My wife thinks I've lost it. The upstairs bannister has all my jeans hanging in it. It's now covered! But it looks great IMO
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 30, 2014 23:21:56 GMT -6
Also, remember that the waist will likely stretch back out to pre soak dimensions no matter what but you'll get the inseam shrink taken care of. Cockandballs. This sounds like exactly the opposite of what I want. I am a 35/36 Straight "tweener" in Gustin's sanforized stuff, and I went with 38 Straight for the Loomies. G said anything above a 34 waist would get a 38-inch inseam. Mine are at least 1.5" shorter than that. Any more than 0.5-0.75" of shrink in the inseam will render these uncuffable. G's cold soak test on a pair of 31s saw them lose 1.25" inseam, which would leave them essentially unwearable for me, period. And I imagine a pair of 38s would lose more than that. Waist measurement on my pair is a shade over 37", and I do NOT want that to stretch all the way back after soaking. So I want to shrink the waist by 1.5-2" (and have it stay there) and shrink the inseam by virtually nil. It sounds like this is pretty much impossible and if I choose to proceed I am doomed to be the proud owner of a pair of beautifully textured, saggy-assed stovepipes. Ugh. Any ideas for minimizing inseam loss or should I send these back and try my luck again next time they're offered?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 1:12:27 GMT -6
Mattbert, well I don't know. That sounds like a dice roll. You can do all sorts of medieval shit to control shrinkage/stretch. People stick stuff in the waist to minimize shrinkage and I have seen people clamp their pants to something during soak or stretch them with weights while they're wet to get inseam length back. I have no idea how well all that stuff works. I either throw my unsanforized denim in the water and pray or I wear it in the water if the waist shrinkage looks scary. On the waist, you can just wear your belt tight to control stretch...inseam too short though....I think if it were me, I'd send them back or sell them. Even if some weird length stretching thing works during soak, you'd have to repeat it every damn time you washed them and freak out if they get wet. Yuck. Maybe a pair will show up in the stock store with a correct inseam? Sorry man, that sucks. I know the Loomie love is strong and getting jacked up pants isn't fun after a wait.
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Dec 31, 2014 2:40:19 GMT -6
Stack them!!!! Thats what I do.
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 31, 2014 9:07:18 GMT -6
Stack them!!!! Thats what I do. Problem is, if they end up at less than 35" inseam post-soak then even stacking will be pushing it. More like hanging than stacking.
|
|
|
Post by univibe88 on Dec 31, 2014 9:26:15 GMT -6
For those of you who've done The Soak already, how much inseam length did you lose? I didn't measure my inseam before and after b/c I knew had plenty to play with. Sorry brah. It's a real bummer that your loomies started off so under spec in the inseam. It sounds like you should cut bait and try to find a pair of 37s with a proper inseam.
|
|
|
Post by stinky on Dec 31, 2014 9:53:50 GMT -6
Stack them!!!! Thats what I do. Problem is, if they end up at less than 35" inseam post-soak then even stacking will be pushing it. More like hanging than stacking. FTR, my 36Rs from the original run have a 34" inseam. I don't know what the initial inseam actually was because I am not the original owner, but I do find it odd that they could have shrunk 4" through soaking. I know that they were soaked by the initial owner at least once, and they were a little large on me when i got them (plus they had someone else's junk in them), so I did a warm machine wash and a hang dry after I got them. They didn't lose any length in the hot wash, but did shrink laterally. They are my go-to Gs and fit great. I got them mid-september and have worn them 70-80% of the time since I got them and haven't washed them since the first wash. I guess what I'm telling you is, you might ultimately have a length issue if they sewed up short. Stretch them lengthwise during drying and hope for the best. Regarding the waist, I wear either a 33 or 34 slim in G, and I have no problem with the waist stretching out to the original size, so you should be okay there. As I've said before, I think there's value on the resale market for a once-soaked, predictably sized pair of loomies, so my advice would be to go for it--soak those suckers, and see what happens. You could cold soak the legs and hot soak the waist and top-block . . .
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 31, 2014 14:15:15 GMT -6
For those of you who've done The Soak already, how much inseam length did you lose? I didn't measure my inseam before and after b/c I knew had plenty to play with. Sorry brah. It's a real bummer that your loomies started off so under spec in the inseam. It sounds like you should cut bait and try to find a pair of 37s with a proper inseam. I think the 38s with a proper inseam would still be best. I'd be worried the 37s would end up too snug through the legs for me. A perfect waist fit is not worth having the jeans fit like Conan's jeggings everywhere else. I'd much rather have them fit well from the dick down and just control post-soak rebound stretch in the waist by wearing a belt. No big deal, since I always wear a belt anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Dec 31, 2014 14:35:31 GMT -6
Problem is, if they end up at less than 35" inseam post-soak then even stacking will be pushing it. More like hanging than stacking. FTR, my 36Rs from the original run have a 34" inseam. I don't know what the initial inseam actually was because I am not the original owner, but I do find it odd that they could have shrunk 4" through soaking. I know that they were soaked by the initial owner at least once, and they were a little large on me when i got them (plus they had someone else's junk in them), so I did a warm machine wash and a hang dry after I got them. They didn't lose any length in the hot wash, but did shrink laterally. They are my go-to Gs and fit great. I got them mid-september and have worn them 70-80% of the time since I got them and haven't washed them since the first wash. I guess what I'm telling you is, you might ultimately have a length issue if they sewed up short. Stretch them lengthwise during drying and hope for the best. Regarding the waist, I wear either a 33 or 34 slim in G, and I have no problem with the waist stretching out to the original size, so you should be okay there. As I've said before, I think there's value on the resale market for a once-soaked, predictably sized pair of loomies, so my advice would be to go for it--soak those suckers, and see what happens. You could cold soak the legs and hot soak the waist and top-block . . . Yeah, I suspect I'm not even remotely close to the only one who got a short inseam on his Loomies. It's just that I'm one of a handful of tall, stork-legged guys for whom this is actually a bug rather than bonus feature. Unless you're a fellow member of the longshanks brigade (We few, we happy cranky few...) then I'm guessing most guys were like univibe88 and had no reason to worry about checking the pre-soak inseam. I think you are absolutely correct about the resale value of post-soak Loomies...depending on the buyer. For me, a newbie to unsanforized denim, the soak 'n shrink experience was a big part of the appeal. But I can definitely see how others might place a higher value on greater certainty regarding the fit.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbunny on Dec 31, 2014 17:46:46 GMT -6
Hey everybody, happy new year! I'm new here, but I have been a Gustin customer for a good while now. I'd like to trade my 36 Reg. Loomies for someone's 35 Reg. Loomies. They have been hot soaked and measure 17.5" across the waist, and measure 34 to 35 in the inseam. I wear a 34 slim in G-jeans usually and I think these will stretch to be too loose. I like my jeans to fit close. Any jeans that I've ever treasured started too tight and ended up perfect.
|
|
|
Post by wdw on Jan 3, 2015 9:16:13 GMT -6
Got mine today after paying $42 import costs, and am disappointed. Usually get 34", so ordered 36, expecting a 36 waist and 38 leg. Actually got a labelled 36 with 34 waist and 36 leg. If I lived in the US I would send them back.
Not sure whether to just go for it and hope that the shrinkage is less than they say. Anyone have any advice based on their own experience?
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 3, 2015 11:59:33 GMT -6
Got mine today after paying $42 import costs, and am disappointed. Usually get 34", so ordered 36, expecting a 36 waist and 38 leg. Actually got a labelled 36 with 34 waist and 36 leg. If I lived in the US I would send them back. Not sure whether to just go for it and hope that the shrinkage is less than they say. Anyone have any advice based on their own experience? Mine didn't shrink as much in the waist as the other dimensions, which was a bummer for me but would be good news for you. I lost 2+ inches on every measure except the waist, where I lost maybe an inch. I normally wear a 34 straight or 35 slim, I got 37 slim loomies and they are amazeballs as long as the waist stays shrunk. I wore them damp (but not in the tub, just after) and could tell the waist was going to end up loose so I threw a belt on. Since you want no waist shrinkage I would say soak them with something inserted in the top block to physically prevent it, and then wear them while damp to make sure they're the perfect size. Trust me, they're worth all the effort .
|
|
|
Post by wdw on Jan 3, 2015 12:12:16 GMT -6
Thanks felizuno. So do you think I should do a hot soak whilst wearing them?
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 3, 2015 12:44:42 GMT -6
I did warm/hot soak without wearing them, and then put them on ~30 minutes after I pulled them from the tub and wore them the rest of the night (~5hrs). I wanted fitted legs so I always knew I was going to hot soak, but depending on your goal maybe cold soak could be a better option for you?
I personally don't find it necessary to wear most fits in the tub as long as you wear them damp afterwards. Sometimes with skinnier fits you have to do it or else you wont even be able to pull them on after. With my slims the calves were in "barely got them on" territory post soak. Since all you're worried about is the waist it seems like the easiest thing to do would be to put something like a cookie sheet in there to prevent shrinkage. In the past I've used an expandable plastic dowel from the closet to do the trick, because you can set an exact size.
Also, many have said, but it can't be repeated enough: DON'T BEND YOUR KNEES WHILE WEARING THE WET JEANS. We all want to love your fit pics, and knee bags would make it hard ;-).
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 3, 2015 12:53:57 GMT -6
Oh, and for people with the "male camel toe" issue with Gustins, I've got something embarrassing to admit: I stuffed a soccer sock down in the bottom of the crotch for an hour or so while they were shrinking and it really helped.
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Jan 3, 2015 12:55:56 GMT -6
and please no "during soak" tea-bags either.
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 3, 2015 12:59:07 GMT -6
and please no "during soak" tea-bags either. I have never tried this, but see this comment all the time. Same about coffee. I'm not really interested to try, but I am curious why it's such a bad idea?
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 3, 2015 13:07:55 GMT -6
Fit pic so you know what I ended up with: [/ur
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Jan 3, 2015 15:30:57 GMT -6
Thanks felizuno. So do you think I should do a hot soak whilst wearing them? wdw, I have faith you can still make these work based on my Loomstate experience. I have an actuall 35" waist and my Loomies came to me at 33.5"....yeah...I thought I was doomed. I could button them up pre soak but they were the snuggest of snug. So I said eff it! I grabbed three beers per the @stevekas soaking method, drew a comfortably cold bath, put them on and sat in them while I soaked for 40 mins. After the soak I layed them on the floor and put a cookie sheet in the top block that measured 17" across and buttoned them up. I let them dry over night. Post soak waist measurement was just under 34 1/4". After wearing for a week or so the waist now measures 35", success!
|
|
|
Post by wdw on Jan 3, 2015 16:25:54 GMT -6
Ok, ickes, I'm going to go for the soak tomorrow. Like you say, do you think tepid (bearable) is better than hot? They're not too tight around the waist just now, with 0.5" or so space, although I wouldn't want the hips any tighter. I can also happily lose an inch or so off the leg if I only single cuff.
I'm just nervous that whatever I do tomorrow, that the first time they go in a washing machine (months from now), they'll shrink even more.
|
|