|
Post by Mattbert on Jan 27, 2015 0:03:38 GMT -6
You might be onto something there, Old26. I wonder if the alignment and sizing issues are related. As in, they're crudely trying to compensate for poor cutting or some other root cause of the pattern misalignment, and in brute forcing some attempted correction they have to trim some fabric edges or it's just how the math works out that they lose some circumference on the shirt. Anyone have serious size issues with a solid fabric shirt? If most of the mis-sized shirts are patterned fabric, then that would suggest there's a link.
|
|
|
Post by Old26 on Jan 27, 2015 0:07:37 GMT -6
You might be onto something there, Old26. I wonder if the alignment and sizing issues are related. As in, they're crudely trying to compensate for poor cutting or some other root cause of the pattern misalignment, and in brute forcing some attempted correction they have to trim some fabric edges or it's just how the math works out that they lose some circumference on the shirt. I just think it's either not stressed at the sewers, or not within their skill set. How does one NOT look at a pattern and see it? How does management not correct it, or stop making patterned shirts? Seriously, I still buy shirts from "lesser" places and get more joy - or is it less disappointment - than I read about online with some of these guys. I had to give on the whole KS model for now as I wanted some new gear for the upcoming spring/summer. Hopefully, I'll get my LD by summer (please, it better be sooner) and I'll know if I'm ever going back. I may not at this point. PS - I wore my TS shirt today - forgot the name of it - and my wife was going nuts over it. I guess I've only worn it under a jacket or something. It is nice. I'm getting formal wear now as I have a couple industry things this month, including an awards show. Tuxes are easy compared to denim and flannel for some reason...
|
|
|
Post by oatwilly on Jan 27, 2015 20:05:53 GMT -6
Yeah already packed up. Honestly I was too mad to do a photoshoot. I couldn't get it back into it's plastic garbage bag-style 'mailer' fast enough. And yes, G has been emailed. From removing it from my mailbox to packing the thing back up to hitting send on that email all went down in under 10 minutes. That's too bad oatwilly, sorry to hear about your luck. With the poor craftsmanship aside, how did you like the fabric? Its the green cousin to my Blue Rustic Twill which I love, and I was thinking I'd back the green rustic twill if they brought it back. If the craftsmanship wasn't so poor would it be a shirt you'd recommend? Underwhelmed to be honest. They are very good at macro-photographing tiny little swatches and making them look appealing. Seeing it in person as a full size shirt, it wasn't anything I'd really look twice at if I saw it hanging in a store for $81. I would have kept it and worn it and gotten several years use out of it had it been made properly though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2015 21:18:04 GMT -6
That's too bad oatwilly, sorry to hear about your luck. With the poor craftsmanship aside, how did you like the fabric? Its the green cousin to my Blue Rustic Twill which I love, and I was thinking I'd back the green rustic twill if they brought it back. If the craftsmanship wasn't so poor would it be a shirt you'd recommend? Underwhelmed to be honest. They are very good at macro-photographing tiny little swatches and making them look appealing. Seeing it in person as a full size shirt, it wasn't anything I'd really look twice at if I saw it hanging in a store for $81. I would have kept it and worn it and gotten several years use out of it had it been made properly though. Can I say x100 on this post? I look back to all the G shirts and I don't believe I will pick up any one of them if they hang in a store for the current G's price. $140 for a indigo button down shirt? Seriously, I will not even go with that if it has the RRL or EG label on it.
|
|
|
Post by marauder on Jan 27, 2015 21:44:58 GMT -6
I think they do a far better job of producing and QCing bottoms than they do tops. I haven't heard many issues with the jeans lately. That is something that used to be a bigger issue and got better over time. I'm not quite sure what's happening with the shirts. Is it that the coolness of the fabric just makes up for the faults for most people and they, either don't notice, or they consider it as a minor flaw and are willing to live with it. Perhaps we, the discerning and perceptive bunch here is not their majority market and hence a couple of returns here and there are a non issue for G.
|
|
|
Post by oatwilly on Jan 27, 2015 21:55:18 GMT -6
I think many just don't look at them that closely. I didn't notice the problems with mine until I saw people on the web complaining about them, then I went and looked and noticed the flaws. Then I looked at other similar shirts in my closet, Lucky, Banana Republic, etc, and they are all dead perfect. So I compared my Gustin shirts using the other shirts as a standard, and was disgusted the way the Gustins fell short. 4 of the 5 I had went straight back for a refund. Kept one that wasn't too bad, but far from perfect. Then this week the worst of the lot shows up in my mailbox, as if to mock me, lol.
I've purchased 6 pairs of their jeans over the last year, and all were great, measured right up to spec, no problems whatsoever. But the shirts, what a joke!
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Jan 27, 2015 22:48:01 GMT -6
You might be onto something there, Old26. I wonder if the alignment and sizing issues are related. As in, they're crudely trying to compensate for poor cutting or some other root cause of the pattern misalignment, and in brute forcing some attempted correction they have to trim some fabric edges or it's just how the math works out that they lose some circumference on the shirt. I just think it's either not stressed at the sewers, or not within their skill set. How does one NOT look at a pattern and see it? How does management not correct it, or stop making patterned shirts? Seriously, I still buy shirts from "lesser" places and get more joy - or is it less disappointment - than I read about online with some of these guys. I had to give on the whole KS model for now as I wanted some new gear for the upcoming spring/summer. Hopefully, I'll get my LD by summer (please, it better be sooner) and I'll know if I'm ever going back. I may not at this point. PS - I wore my TS shirt today - forgot the name of it - and my wife was going nuts over it. I guess I've only worn it under a jacket or something. It is nice. I'm getting formal wear now as I have a couple industry things this month, including an awards show. Tuxes are easy compared to denim and flannel for some reason... The Glacier Chambray? Yeah, that is easily my favorite heavy shirt in my closet right now. Possibly the best I've ever owned. To have gotten it for 60-something bucks in Last Call feels like stealing.
|
|
|
Post by davelewis on Jan 27, 2015 22:52:46 GMT -6
For sure, some of my best scores have been TS last calls.
|
|
|
Post by brentkuz on Jan 28, 2015 14:38:22 GMT -6
Well I feel like I've been duped. Kinda
I've been putting it off for awhile now. I got a royal red plaid not too long ago and never checked out the placket or pattern alignment. Well I have a day off today and decided to measure it up. Took it out of the closet and wow.
Placket isn't even close to lining up and side to side also is off. Not as bad as the guy with the blue rust flannel but it's off. I can't really contact G now since it's been some time but crap this sucks.
Once again it's not horrendous but still bad. Looked at my 30$ Jcrew factory shirt and no issues. Same with my $10 Old navy gingham.
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 28, 2015 15:17:15 GMT -6
To follow up on the Orange plaid I posted the other day: Ren immediately offered to take the shirt back for credit, which was great. I was a little bummed they asked me to send it back, as it's not that convenient for me to go to USPS, but I suppose if they don't have the shirt in hand they won't be able to call out the vendor.
In my email I made the point that it's easy to see from reviews that the vendor Gustin uses is skewing the fabric into alignment during construction of patterned shirts. I said that after having this issue on 2/2 patterned shirts I would be backing out of the Monster Twill unless he could offer me some assurance that things would be different, or at least confirm they'd brought it up with the vendor.
He didn't directly address this issue but did say that they're not doing it on purpose. I proceeded to back out of the Monster Twill (now closed) and will not be backing patterned Gustin shirts again unless they change vendors or I see some kind of communication around the issue. I'm sure they take this seriously, but with no public statement about it they're leaving me with no reason to have confidence in them.
Again, love my jeans, love my work shirts, love my solid shirts, love my chore coat. 2 for 2 completely unwearable patterned shirts = clear vendor issue.
|
|
|
Post by denimdon on Jan 28, 2015 15:46:30 GMT -6
I think QC is the problem or lack thereof... People make mistakes so not every shirt is gonna be perfect, But it's Gustin's job to check for said mistakes
|
|
|
Post by felizuno on Jan 28, 2015 16:16:54 GMT -6
I think QC is the problem or lack thereof... People make mistakes so not every shirt is gonna be perfect, But it's Gustin's job to check for said mistakes Based on my (limited) experience I assume the shirts come already bagged from the shop as the construction QC should fall on them. The idea that they would not QC things before letting them out the door seems absurd - if a shop told me that they don't QC their products I would end the conversation right there and move on. I would expect Gustin's part of the QC process to be similar to that of a retailer: looking over the bagged shirts to make sure they are labeled and tagged correctly, all the buttons are there, and other checks related to shipping people the item they ordered. While there were several QC issues with my orange plaid none of them are visible when the shirt is in the bag. I really think all the blame here falls on the vendor except for the radio silence around the issue, which is Gustin's problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 16:31:22 GMT -6
I think QC is the problem or lack thereof... People make mistakes so not every shirt is gonna be perfect, But it's Gustin's job to check for said mistakes Based on my (limited) experience I assume the shirts come already bagged from the shop as the construction QC should fall on them. The idea that they would not QC things before letting them out the door seems absurd - if a shop told me that they don't QC their products I would end the conversation right there and move on. I would expect Gustin's part of the QC process to be similar to that of a retailer: looking over the bagged shirts to make sure they are labeled and tagged correctly, all the buttons are there, and other checks related to shipping people the item they ordered. While there were several QC issues with my orange plaid none of them are visible when the shirt is in the bag. I really think all the blame here falls on the vendor except for the radio silence around the issue, which is Gustin's problem. I agree with the absurdity re: lack of QC...but at the end of the day the whole ball of wax is Gustin's problem. It's Josh's name on the tag, you'd think he'd want to send something out the door that he was proud of...regardless of who stitched it up. They've chosen the sew shop and while maybe they're not responsible for the poor construction, they're ultimately accountable. Of course this is assuming that customers actually a.) notice the issue, and b.) return the poorly sewn shirts. Considering how many people on IG, Reddit, and SF rave about the shirts I'd guess they may think there is a very small percentage of problem shirts in the wild. Should Gustin notice themselves how crap the shirts are...yep...but I don't expect them to take action based on forum commentary...rather from returned items and slowing backed product.
|
|
|
Post by Old26 on Jan 28, 2015 17:37:17 GMT -6
Hey all, my son wants the Gustin 'Boner jeans. Anyone care to comment on sizing of these? Run true or?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by wisdom on Jan 28, 2015 17:46:30 GMT -6
Hey all, my son wants the Gustin 'Boner jeans. Anyone care to comment on sizing of these? Run true or? Thanks! I have the GxB 'boners.. they came in at the high side of spec.. around 31" for size 30.
|
|
|
Post by Old26 on Jan 28, 2015 18:02:24 GMT -6
Hey all, my son wants the Gustin 'Boner jeans. Anyone care to comment on sizing of these? Run true or? Thanks! I have the GxB 'boners.. they came in at the high side of spec.. around 31" for size 30. Thanks! Are these things suppose to shrink? Stretch? I should know more, but since I don't want them myself, I've not paid attention...
|
|
|
Post by wisdom on Jan 28, 2015 18:09:17 GMT -6
I have the GxB 'boners.. they came in at the high side of spec.. around 31" for size 30. Thanks! Are these things suppose to shrink? Stretch? I should know more, but since I don't want them myself, I've not paid attention... Haven't worn them enough, or soaked, to be able to give you a definitive answer. I've been controlling waist size with my belt, but they've softened a bit, meaning they'll likely stretch a bit.
|
|
|
Post by oatwilly on Jan 28, 2015 18:25:21 GMT -6
So here's the reply I got from Gustin explaining why their patterned shirts are all hosed:
"We spoke to our production manager yesterday about this and something clicked. We realized that the normal cutter was on vacation when these last shirts were being made which may be the cause of this alignment issue. We're just as upset about is as you care because we're ending up taking a loss on these items. We'll do our best to make sure you're taken care of.
Ren"
|
|
|
Post by bentin on Jan 28, 2015 18:29:43 GMT -6
Was it a two year vacation?
|
|
|
Post by brentkuz on Jan 28, 2015 18:47:24 GMT -6
Was it a two year vacation? I wish it was something like "we realized our cutter was smoking meth"
|
|
|
Post by oatwilly on Jan 28, 2015 18:48:12 GMT -6
Was it a two year vacation? That was my thought as well, lol. This latest shirt was much worse than the others though, so I think he's saying that while the regular guy sucks, the temp guy REALLY sucked
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 18:56:00 GMT -6
"we spoke with our production manager and something clicked. our normally incompetent cutter was on vacation, and the temp was surprisingly worse. of course the sewers noticed, but they didn't say anything and instead tried to cobble shirts together using the mess they were given. and yes...the button sewers should have noticed how bad the shirts looked, but really they're just trying to make their button quota. oh...the qc person 'inspecting' the shirts upon completion...well we saved $2 per shirt by not hiring one. we wondered why the guy folding and bagging the shirts was chuckling to himself all week...and thanks to your inquiry we now know."
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Jan 28, 2015 21:16:35 GMT -6
I think QC is the problem or lack thereof... People make mistakes so not every shirt is gonna be perfect, But it's Gustin's job to check for said mistakes I stayed in on the Monster Twill. It's going back if it's awful, but I agree here. Gustin forces their vendor to eat the cost on a couple runs, vendor either A) fixes, or B) stops being the vendor.
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Jan 28, 2015 21:21:08 GMT -6
Hey all, my son wants the Gustin 'Boner jeans. Anyone care to comment on sizing of these? Run true or? Thanks! I have the GxB 'boners.. they came in at the high side of spec.. around 31" for size 30. my GxB came in on the low side, the shy side of 33 on a 33 tag, the brown x black herringbone jeans came in the same way. I haven't put enough wear on them to say whether they soften up over time, and I haven't been able to commit to wearing either of them enough to test it. So I mostly use them as "nicer" pants and break them out for occasions rather than daily wear.
|
|
|
Post by wisdom on Jan 28, 2015 21:28:07 GMT -6
I have the GxB 'boners.. they came in at the high side of spec.. around 31" for size 30. my GxB came in on the low side, the shy side of 33 on a 33 tag. Yeah.. I think it's more a function of the operator, rather than fabric in the case of the GxB 'boners.
|
|