|
|
Post by northcoast on Aug 11, 2016 8:07:58 GMT -6
I'd probably buy the new green herringbone camp pants if they would fit.
Those fill a sweet spot in my pants that is currently empty.
|
|
|
|
New Drops
Aug 31, 2016 15:05:13 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by bentin on Aug 31, 2016 15:05:13 GMT -6
Mildly hopeful that they drop a CA made shirt tonight. The last women's drop is a CA made shirt. FU Portugal!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 31, 2016 21:45:49 GMT -6
Glacier Shirts...proudly made in California, bentin. Are you back in on TS? |
|
|
|
Post by northcoast on Aug 31, 2016 21:50:05 GMT -6
Glacier Shirts...proudly made in California, bentin . Are you back in on TS? Frick, now I want that gray and blue one. That is a nice cut and concept. I think I'll pass on the Terry and the green. Product shots making me pissed I didn't pull the trigger on those green camp pants. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 31, 2016 22:48:13 GMT -6
Glacier Shirts...proudly made in California, bentin . Are you back in on TS? Frick, now I want that gray and blue one. That is a nice cut and concept. I think I'll pass on the Terry and the green. Product shots making me pissed I didn't pull the trigger on those green camp pants. That plaid is growing on me...but I'm most likely in on the green. TS really has the market cornered on all things olive and drab. |
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Sept 1, 2016 0:27:50 GMT -6
It's great to see the Glacier making it's return. By far, my favorite TS design. I had begun to wonder if TS had scrapped the design, altogether......
They've made a small change, though. They've given it a pointed, western style yoke. It's not necessarily a deal breaker. But, depending on the fabric, it could be.
Edit: I like the yoke on the plaid. Though, I haven't quite warmed up to the fabric. I love the indigo terry. But, I think the original straight yoke design would be better suited to it.....
I may have just talked myself out of either of them. Pity.....
|
|
|
|
Post by gaseousclay on Sept 1, 2016 5:39:12 GMT -6
I like the Glacier shirt in the navy/grey plaid and the olive twill, but their sizing is confusing. so the size medium is listed as a 44, as in 22" p2p? then they have the size right above it that says find your size and has size large listed as a 42.
|
|
|
|
Post by bentin on Sept 1, 2016 8:30:05 GMT -6
Actually prefer the snaps and western yoke. Could see grabbing all three, but the Indigo Terry is a must, very unique.
|
|
|
|
Post by benjaminpersitz on Sept 1, 2016 10:09:37 GMT -6
I like the Glacier shirt in the navy/grey plaid and the olive twill, but their sizing is confusing. so the size medium is listed as a 44, as in 22" p2p? then they have the size right above it that says find your size and has size large listed as a 42. Medium is a 40. And the glacier shirt is cut trim in my experience. I'm wearing my Yosemite in a 40 today for reference:  I'm 5'8 and I've put on some weight. 190 right now. But it fit me well when I was 170 too. I have broad shoulders, a full chest, and a little beer belly. Long torso. Hopefully that helps. |
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 1, 2016 10:15:25 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by bentin on Sept 1, 2016 10:15:25 GMT -6
Tight in the chest, waist or both? Kinda debating sizing up one to wear more as an overshirt.
|
|
|
|
Post by benjaminpersitz on Sept 1, 2016 10:28:03 GMT -6
Tight in the chest, waist or both? Kinda debating sizing up one to wear more as an overshirt. I wouldn't say its tight at all. Maybe a tad in the chest but not noticeably. I'm wearing it over a Gustin t shirt. |
|
|
|
Post by DigDug on Sept 1, 2016 11:07:04 GMT -6
Actually prefer the snaps and western yoke. Could see grabbing all three, but the Indigo Terry is a must, very unique. Think I might use my store credit for the Terry one also. Different fabric,use,feel,etc then any other shirt I have. |
|
|
|
Post by drewcandraw on Sept 1, 2016 13:02:17 GMT -6
damn Ben (hopefully u go by that haha) we are about the same height and weight as well as beer belly but no way I could fit into the 40. My Yosemite is a 42 and that is pretty trim on me. Prolly could have gone with a 44.
Never got a glacier so I might have to try one out finally.
|
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 1, 2016 22:35:04 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by exophobe on Sept 1, 2016 22:35:04 GMT -6
Actually prefer the snaps and western yoke. Could see grabbing all three, but the Indigo Terry is a must, very unique. Is there a cheat sheet to the new size chart, or just buy the size that you usually get from Taylor stitch? The 42 is a large with an apparent 48" chest? I know there were some talks about it, but I didn't care until they dropped these. I'm liking the indigo terry and grey plaid quite a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Sept 2, 2016 0:44:55 GMT -6
well I don't know if this will be any help to anybody considering the fit guide clusterf!@k that's going on at TS right now, but I picked up two Glacier shirts two years ago and they were sized larger than my other TS shirts. I ordered one size down from my normal size.
|
|
|
|
Post by gaseousclay on Sept 2, 2016 5:56:39 GMT -6
well I don't know if this will be any help to anybody considering the fit guide clusterf!@k that's going on at TS right now, but I picked up two Glacier shirts two years ago and they were sized larger than my other TS shirts. I ordered one size down from my normal size. clusterf*ck indeed. I hope TS is bracing themselves for a sh!t ton of returns/exchanges because of their incongruous fit guide. when I was trying to figure out my size the large was listed as a 42 and then when you look at the other fit chart below it a proper large (with 44" chest) is a medium. Makes no sense at all. |
|
|
|
Post by kkozel on Sept 2, 2016 7:06:12 GMT -6
well I don't know if this will be any help to anybody considering the fit guide clusterf!@k that's going on at TS right now, but I picked up two Glacier shirts two years ago and they were sized larger than my other TS shirts. I ordered one size down from my normal size. clusterf*ck indeed. I hope TS is bracing themselves for a sh!t ton of returns/exchanges because of their incongruous fit guide. when I was trying to figure out my size the large was listed as a 42 and then when you look at the other fit chart below it a proper large (with 44" chest) is a medium. Makes no sense at all. Agree with you guys - im just taking the stance of "I'm ordering whats worked in the past" and if it doesn't fit - ill be hoping an exchange works. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 8:31:04 GMT -6
Agree with you guys - im just taking the stance of "I'm ordering whats worked in the past" and if it doesn't fit - ill be hoping an exchange works. this is likely the best approach...order the size that you'd normally order. i'd be willing to bet that they didn't overhaul the actual sizing of the garments, as that would be a huge undertaking...but are trying to rework how they represent the sizing to the customers. hopefully they land on a method that works for everyone (and numbers that are correct). i don't know why it's so difficult for manufacturers to do in the first place. people who already know their size are probably fine, those who don't are probably in store for a round of trial and error. |
|
|
|
Post by northcoast on Sept 2, 2016 9:05:14 GMT -6
Not trying to drive traffic, just saying....
extensive conversation about this on SForum and the rep hangs out there so if you so inclined hammer on them in that thread and know that it will be read.
though I'm guessing it 'may' be read here as well
|
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 2, 2016 9:33:18 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by bentin on Sept 2, 2016 9:33:18 GMT -6
If they don't know that their current sizing stuff is stupid, they can f right the hell off to Portugal.
Huggz.
|
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 2, 2016 11:03:26 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by exophobe on Sept 2, 2016 11:03:26 GMT -6
Agree with you guys - im just taking the stance of "I'm ordering whats worked in the past" and if it doesn't fit - ill be hoping an exchange works. this is likely the best approach...order the size that you'd normally order. i'd be willing to bet that they didn't overhaul the actual sizing of the garments, as that would be a huge undertaking...but are trying to rework how they represent the sizing to the customers. hopefully they land on a method that works for everyone (and numbers that are correct). i don't know why it's so difficult for manufacturers to do in the first place. people who already know their size are probably fine, those who don't are probably in store for a round of trial and error. The sizing advice is definitely under construction, as it tells you to measure an existing garment and use that number, but I'm certain I don't have any shirts that are 46" wide. |
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 2, 2016 11:20:47 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by benjaminpersitz on Sept 2, 2016 11:20:47 GMT -6
this is likely the best approach...order the size that you'd normally order. i'd be willing to bet that they didn't overhaul the actual sizing of the garments, as that would be a huge undertaking...but are trying to rework how they represent the sizing to the customers. hopefully they land on a method that works for everyone (and numbers that are correct). i don't know why it's so difficult for manufacturers to do in the first place. people who already know their size are probably fine, those who don't are probably in store for a round of trial and error. The sizing advice is definitely under construction, as it tells you to measure an existing garment and use that number, but I'm certain I don't have any shirts that are 46" wide. The worst part is the pants not having any measurement. It's not hard to write: "Pants are sized differently than traditional vanity sizing, please see size chart" |
|
|
|
Post by northcoast on Sept 2, 2016 11:50:14 GMT -6
The sizing advice is definitely under construction, as it tells you to measure an existing garment and use that number, but I'm certain I don't have any shirts that are 46" wide. The worst part is the pants not having any measurement. It's not hard to write: "Pants are sized differently than traditional vanity sizing, please see size chart" ahh not so fast there the 36 camp pant is 38.5 waist thats vanity sizing |
|
|
|
Post by davelewis on Sept 2, 2016 11:56:44 GMT -6
Even before the current sizing fiasco, they weren't super consistent, as I have 5 TS shirts in the same size, and they all fit differently, from spot on, to a bit large, ie. overshirt size.
|
|
|
|
New Drops
Sept 2, 2016 12:23:19 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by benjaminpersitz on Sept 2, 2016 12:23:19 GMT -6
The worst part is the pants not having any measurement. It's not hard to write: "Pants are sized differently than traditional vanity sizing, please see size chart" ahh not so fast there the 36 camp pant is 38.5 waist thats vanity sizing Good point. They be crazy. |
|
