|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 12, 2014 19:18:21 GMT -6
i've been wearing my 14oz cone Orange ID for about a week now and thought i'd provide a small update (initial thoughts here) overall i'm really happy with these jeans. they're very comfortable, 2nd only to my pajama like gustin japan classics. any concern i had about the snug calves has dissipated with fabric break in. i'm curious what they'll be like after a soak or wash, but that won't happen for quite some time (especially since i get a custom inseam length with LD...no need for aftermarket hemming) the larger front pockets, more substantial pocket bag material, and easier to access pockets may be one thing that would keep me buying LD over Gustin time and time again. the only ding against this pair so far is a strange pouching/creasing that seems to be developing across the rear yoke. i've drawn a line in the below image showing where this is taking place. it's a bit more pronounced with a belt (which i almost always wear). the rise on these is ever so slightly higher than some of my other jeans, thus the center yoke-waistband seam is slightly longer...not sure if that extra fabric compounded with any downward pressure from my belt is causing it or not. it's not severe, and not extreme enough that i'd consider returning any jeans that developed the same thing...but if i had to pick an area for potential fit improvement...this would be it. i may try to get a photo of what i'm talking about tomorrow when there is more light, but it may be tough to photograph while wearing the jeans. Good to hear Ok I do not see what u are describing BUT i think I know what you are talking about. Do you mean the fabric that makes up the yoke is bubbling outward? I have seen this on a few fits in my denim forum travels. I couldnt attempt to explain it but if thats what you are referring to I can find out a fix if it ends up being a fault with the fit overall. I would think it has to do with something pulling or stressing the waist to push downward but I don know. Anyone have an idea? On a side note I brought up how great Roman's fits were and said the full custom option looks really perfect when done that way. He said "thats the thing, I used the regular measurements for his samples and did not make it specific to me" I was surprised because I assumed he would make it perfect to show how good that could look but it made sense after thinking about it to do it just like we do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2014 19:18:34 GMT -6
ickes in the photo i just drew a line in the general area that i see the (outward) crease happening. i'll see if i can get a better shot tomorrow while actually wearing them. like i said, it's not an 'issue' per se and hopefully the new slightly lower rise will alleviate it altogether.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2014 19:26:58 GMT -6
Dirty_Denim i probably shouldn't have included the photo in my post. that photo is actually from when the jeans were brand new and was simply used to illustrate where the 'bubbling' is taking place. i'll try to get a better one posted tomorrow. based on your description of the yoke bubbling outward i'm pretty sure that you're correctly envisioning what is happening. i do have a bit of a butt, and the point of the yoke sits right at the top...so perhaps upward pressure from the curve of my butt and the downward pressure from my belt cause that bubbling across the yoke. *shrug* the angle of the yoke on these is a bit more steep than some of my other jeans, as well as the slightly higher rise. i'm curious if the pairs i have in the works will have a slightly lower rise and if the same thing will happen.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 12, 2014 20:36:42 GMT -6
A little more Lawless love for roman and the team. I received a call today from Jim to stop in for a sizing on the 18.5's and while I was initially planned to stop in at 3:30, I didn't arrive until 4:20 (work meetings do that). Nevertheless, Jim was there and more than understanding for my delay. Note: for the locals or anyone who's traveling in -I highly recommend you take up this option if you have the means. It was great to see my denim in their near-finished form - length was raw, belt loops were raw, but the jean was a thing of beauty. I wasn't too particular - a slim straight with an inch off the thigh was my only requirement - and this denim was exactly how I hoped they'd fit in the thigh and leg. Not too slim, but a slim straight that works well on my build. They noted the fit and will apply any notes to my other 2 KS orders. In addition, Jim is a great guy - he works on the operations side and gave me some more insight into their efforts to improve the quality control on the products they produced. It's a really smartly run company. I continue to be impressed by their attention to detail, in both the products and their efforts in building a sound and smart business model. I know I come off as the local fan boy, but I would be honest and critical if I saw a reason to be. The biggest drawback I would assume is parking when there's a Suns or Diamondback game...lol.
|
|
|
Post by Derek G on Nov 12, 2014 20:51:51 GMT -6
Hi brothers I'm into vintage receivers, turntables, speakers etc from the 70's. and when we compare 2 brands, we do an A+B comparison. To that point, I did an A+B on my G 16ers and Lawless black waxed. I love my 16ers...don't get me wrong, But.... "God is in the detail", expressing the idea that whatever one does should be done thoroughly; i.e. details are important.[1]... (I hijacked that from wiki )... Judge for yourselves, here is the ( link ) Just to be clear, Im in no way bashing G, But I think Lawless is clearly a better quality garment. If you'd like some other comparisons, I'd gladly take some more pics for you guys
|
|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 13, 2014 0:08:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Nov 13, 2014 6:30:05 GMT -6
The wide (high) yoke is the first thing I noted on the jeans, together with the small backpockets. These are the 2 things I am slightly worried about, also sporting a sporty bubble-butt. Im glad to get the peach-id test jeans to see it in person. Im thinking my own 18oz will have less of a problem with this, but good to know.
|
|
|
Post by davelewis on Nov 13, 2014 9:19:31 GMT -6
Those look like a great fit. I would expect more excellent reviews when others start receiving their orders.
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Nov 13, 2014 13:44:02 GMT -6
Hi brothers I'm into vintage receivers, turntables, speakers etc from the 70's. and when we compare 2 brands, we do an A+B comparison. To that point, I did an A+B on my G 16ers and Lawless black waxed. I love my 16ers...don't get me wrong, But.... "God is in the detail", expressing the idea that whatever one does should be done thoroughly; i.e. details are important.[1]... (I hijacked that from wiki )... Judge for yourselves, here is the ( link ) Just to be clear, Im in no way bashing G, But I think Lawless is clearly a better quality garment. If you'd like some other comparisons, I'd gladly take some more pics for you guys So there are a couple strange things here, which actually enforce your point. Your gustin "crotch seam" appears to be missing both the accompanying blue stitch that goes down the inseam, and the bar-tack in the four-way seam. It could just be the picture (the blue stitch does come close to disappearing in indigo), but if both of those are indeed missing I certainly understand your assessment. The finishing detail (where the raw edge is finished, I think that was a pic of the fly or the inseam) shows that Roman's talk of obsession with sewing machines is more than just talk. That's something that is out of Gustin's control, however, since they don't get to dictate how the sew-shop is run. This edge finish is a matter of how the machine being used works, but locating the machine that gives the superior edge is the effort involved. There was a mention over on style forum of how Lawless was "stealing" Roy's signature fan-stitch on the fly. However, this is a specific sewing machine that does this, not some elaborate "signature move" that was invented for Roy jeans. Maybe that particular use of it is unique, I don't know cause I'm not big on the repro stuff, but if you go that far, then you're going to be accusing people of using chainstitch like other brands. If things had worked out differently, I think it would have been cool for Lawless to pick up some of the Gustin manufacturing (perhaps the appareil version someone (I think Julian) was looking for. They put attention into it that Gustin's SF sew-shop doesn't appear to. The only possible sleight on Gustin here would be the QC (seriously, do you only have one stitch going down the inseam?), and their choice of sub-contractor. But as they've said, the San Francisco thing is big in denim culture, and that's the shop they're using is hard to get floor time in.
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Nov 13, 2014 13:50:23 GMT -6
exophobe; I agree with your statements regarding the comment on style forum that Lawless is "stealing" Roys fan-stitch....that's silly. I believe that Guns and Money utilized the fan stitch as well. highlights can confirm that.
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Nov 13, 2014 14:11:19 GMT -6
That's something that is out of Gustin's control, however, since they don't get to dictate how the sew-shop is run. Maybe you didnt mean this the way I read it. But it sounds wrong. Gustin is surely in control of their own brand, all else would be silly. If they are not happy with the produce, then they can switch to other producers. We cant just eat all mistakes bc "G cant be blamed here, its out of their control.." I can see the second seem in the crouth on the G`s, its just blue and hard to spot.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Nov 13, 2014 14:16:40 GMT -6
Hi brothers I'm into vintage receivers, turntables, speakers etc from the 70's. and when we compare 2 brands, we do an A+B comparison. .............. I love this idea. I too am planning a side-by-side comparison. I have a pair of G Black2, and recently ordered a pair of Kuroki Mills black 2×1 twill from LD. By my observations, and a 99% confirmation from Ickes, I believe the two to be the same denim. When I receive my 2×1 from LD, I will post my thoughts, followed by a post in B/S/T. LOL
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 14:53:49 GMT -6
Dirty_Denim i probably shouldn't have included the photo in my post. that photo is actually from when the jeans were brand new and was simply used to illustrate where the 'bubbling' is taking place. i'll try to get a better one posted tomorrow. based on your description of the yoke bubbling outward i'm pretty sure that you're correctly envisioning what is happening. i do have a bit of a butt, and the point of the yoke sits right at the top...so perhaps upward pressure from the curve of my butt and the downward pressure from my belt cause that bubbling across the yoke. *shrug* the angle of the yoke on these is a bit more steep than some of my other jeans, as well as the slightly higher rise. i'm curious if the pairs i have in the works will have a slightly lower rise and if the same thing will happen. Here's a photo of what I'm referring to with this pair. Overall a minor issue, but thought I'd mention it as this and a few seams that aren't laser straight are the only real constructive criticisms I have for these:
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Nov 13, 2014 14:56:12 GMT -6
Put the belt under the patch. You will love it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 14:57:13 GMT -6
Dirty_Denim i probably shouldn't have included the photo in my post. that photo is actually from when the jeans were brand new and was simply used to illustrate where the 'bubbling' is taking place. i'll try to get a better one posted tomorrow. based on your description of the yoke bubbling outward i'm pretty sure that you're correctly envisioning what is happening. i do have a bit of a butt, and the point of the yoke sits right at the top...so perhaps upward pressure from the curve of my butt and the downward pressure from my belt cause that bubbling across the yoke. *shrug* the angle of the yoke on these is a bit more steep than some of my other jeans, as well as the slightly higher rise. i'm curious if the pairs i have in the works will have a slightly lower rise and if the same thing will happen. Here's a photo of what I'm referring to with this pair. Overall a minor issue, but thought I'd mention it as this and a few seams that aren't laser straight are the only real constructive criticisms I have for these: I don't like those bubbling... I have a pair of RRL that has much worst bubbling issue. I rarely wear them because of that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 14:59:17 GMT -6
Put the belt under the patch. You will love it. funny...i actually switch back and forth, fully undecided which i prefer. Update: After thinking about this comment by Griffin I realized that I had only noticed the bubbling after switching the belt to over the patch. Just did a quick test and threading it under the patch definitely alleviates most of the bubbling. It's still there, but mostly unnoticeable. I'm thinking the belt pressing down on the patch (along with the current stiffness/thickness of the patch) is creating a big chunk of the pressure causing the bubble. This may have just helped me make up my mind on Belt under or over the patch. (thanks for the comment Griffin)
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Nov 13, 2014 15:11:32 GMT -6
I'm actually wondering if running the belt under the patch has an affect on the "slouching" in the yoke. Either way, I'd guess taking an inch or so out of the rear rise would resolve it (obviously someone making denim would have better insight here), but I'm guessing if you pull up on the fabric under the belt it makes it better, but then it slips back down while you're wearing them.
|
|
|
Post by Griffin on Nov 13, 2014 15:40:27 GMT -6
As i am also blessed with a butt women love, i am anxious to see how my fit will be. I have a pair of peach-id in the mail to me as we speak.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 15:57:08 GMT -6
I'm actually wondering if running the belt under the patch has an affect on the "slouching" in the yoke. Either way, I'd guess taking an inch or so out of the rear rise would resolve it (obviously someone making denim would have better insight here), but I'm guessing if you pull up on the fabric under the belt it makes it better, but then it slips back down while you're wearing them. Check my update above. Threading under the patch definitely helped a bit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 16:23:58 GMT -6
As i am also blessed with a butt women love, i am anxious to see how my fit will be. I have a pair of peach-id in the mail to me as we speak. Hate you.
|
|
|
Post by brentkuz on Nov 13, 2014 16:33:27 GMT -6
As i am also blessed with a butt women love, i am anxious to see how my fit will be. I have a pair of peach-id in the mail to me as we speak. Not just women. Grrrrrrr Anyone notice the lawless phone number is no longer in service?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2014 16:45:19 GMT -6
As i am also blessed with a butt women love, i am anxious to see how my fit will be. I have a pair of peach-id in the mail to me as we speak. Not just women. Grrrrrrr Anyone notice the lawless phone number is no longer in service? Yeah, the number is not working.....
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Nov 13, 2014 16:53:30 GMT -6
Maybe you didnt mean this the way I read it. But it sounds wrong. Gustin is surely in control of their own brand, all else would be silly. If they are not happy with the produce, then they can switch to other producers. We cant just eat all mistakes bc "G cant be blamed here, its out of their control.." I can see the second seem in the crouth on the G`s, its just blue and hard to spot. first point - yeah, I just meant they don't get to decide what sewing machines their contractor has, but they certainly get to decide who the contractor is, and if they wanted to, they could say "we want you to do this better". These things are fairly bomb-proof as far as construction, and the non-visible finish edging on the fabric isn't going to decrease their longevity, so it's just a nicer detail, but not something that will make them last longer (over time, yes, but high=wear parts of the fabric are going to give out long before that). It's absolutely theirs to deal with in whatever way, but they don't buy the sewing machines is all I was getting at. Second, see, I thought the same thing, which is why I really doubt it. The title on the picture is single vs triple, though, which is why I started with the "is the blue stitch there" thing. Either way the red bar-tack definitely isn't there, and the image isn't conclusive about the blue thread, but I would be shocked if it isn't there, cause that'd be a major oversight since it goes all the way down the inseam. If he says it is, I almost want to see the cuff, as it would be glaringly obvious there since that's a major part of the inseam structure, and typically there even on cheap Levi's knockoffs. Anyway, here's a pic of the heavy american "crotch seam" I'm comparing against, hopefully Derek G can confirm whether that blue stitching is there, you can see in this image that it does nearly disappear, but I believe the 16ers and the Heavy American should share the same sort of stitching (also have an intereset in this since I've got Am16ers coming before the end of the year).
|
|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 13, 2014 17:32:28 GMT -6
As i am also blessed with a butt women love, i am anxious to see how my fit will be. I have a pair of peach-id in the mail to me as we speak. Not just women. Grrrrrrr Anyone notice the lawless phone number is no longer in service? Chalk up any phone issues to COX
|
|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 13, 2014 17:34:27 GMT -6
No worries guys we are still in business
|
|