Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 22:02:49 GMT -6
716, size 33 Waist: 34 Front Rise: 11 Back Rise: 16.5 Thigh: 25.5 Knee: 18 Inseam: 36.5 How big is the leg opening? 15 |
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Apr 3, 2016 22:05:34 GMT -6
Looking at the specs makes me long for the day they make a 35 for every offering.
|
|
|
|
Post by devastitis on Apr 3, 2016 22:06:18 GMT -6
How big is the leg opening? 15 Thanks! I think the 34s might be the perfect sized chinos for me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 22:09:18 GMT -6
If they don't make more color options in the future, I'll be so bummed
|
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 3, 2016 22:37:54 GMT -6
Man...looking at @untucked's measurements I don't know if these will work for me. That back rise is huge. I thought these were a lower rise for some reason. only a 15" leg opening and a 36.5" inseam is freaking long. Is there any shrink to this fabric?
|
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 3, 2016 22:40:57 GMT -6
Thanks for dropping the sizing knowledge scooter ! A 34 waist will work unless it's a super low rise in which case I'd need 34.5" ish. I'm betting on these being a slimmer cut than the 707s which would mean sizing up in the waist to accommodate my thighs. hmmm If neither the 142 XL or 716 34 work for me, you got first dibs! I'm sure by the end of the week, other shops should be selling the 716s you could grab the 34s then as well. Thanks man! let me know for sure on that 142. I think the 34 716 is going to be too big for me going off of Untucked's measurements. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 22:41:11 GMT -6
I haven't washed yet. And, my measurements could be off... I typically don't waste time with such fickle tasks, lol. I usually go by "fit" or "doesn't fit".
I'll say that these feel as good as my 634GR sz. 33 (I think). Knee up feels the same, and a smaller cuff
|
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 3, 2016 23:01:09 GMT -6
I haven't washed yet. And, my measurements could be off... I typically don't waste time with such fickle tasks, lol. I usually go by "fit" or "doesn't fit". I'll say that these feel as good as my 634GR sz. 33 (I think). Knee up feels the same, and a smaller cuff Man I wish I could be that simple regarding measurements. I have spent way more time than I care to admit obsessing over measurements! lol... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 23:02:36 GMT -6
Really, I just grab a medium shirt and whatever has a 33" waist. It works usually.
|
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 17:01:38 GMT -6
142s landed, they do fit small, but boy, is it bad ass! And @untucked was right the red label looks cool-shows up more maroon than the photos. Awesome shirt
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 17:03:39 GMT -6
Glad you like it! I'm sitting out on this shirt... I've got some other items I want to snag, specifically the short sleeve shirts with slim openings for the arms. I've got a million long sleeve shirts, so I need to make one balance and practicality
|
|
|
|
Post by devastitis on Apr 4, 2016 17:13:27 GMT -6
Glad you like it! I'm sitting out on this shirt... I've got some other items I want to snag, specifically the short sleeve shirts with slim openings for the arms. I've got a million long sleeve shirts, so I need to make one balance and practicality You been working on the gun show? |
|
|
|
Post by devastitis on Apr 4, 2016 17:14:09 GMT -6
142s landed, they do fit small, but boy, is it bad ass! And @untucked was right the red label looks cool-shows up more maroon than the photos. Awesome shirt What size did you get? |
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 4, 2016 17:14:33 GMT -6
142s landed, they do fit small, but boy, is it bad ass! And @untucked was right the red label looks cool-shows up more maroon than the photos. Awesome shirt So you recommend it? What's the fabric like? Yeah that label is definitely maroon, not red. I have the same label on one of my IH Chambrays. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2016 17:14:44 GMT -6
I naturally have a pair of 9mm's, lol! If I want a larger caliber, I have to put in work lol
|
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 4, 2016 17:15:03 GMT -6
I think the 142 in XL is a damnn good fit for me looking at the IHUK size chart.
|
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 17:16:26 GMT -6
Wearing the large, never took the medium out. My Large 142 feels snugger than my 134 in Medium. I'll measure it up now
|
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 17:33:33 GMT -6
142s landed, they do fit small, but boy, is it bad ass! And @untucked was right the red label looks cool-shows up more maroon than the photos. Awesome shirt So you recommend it? What's the fabric like? Yeah that label is definitely maroon, not red. I have the same label on one of my IH Chambrays. The fabric feels less substantial compared to the 134, probably because it lacks the herringbone pattern, so it feels thinner. It still has visual appeal, in that the color is not monotone, but has lighter grey threads "heathered" in (?) The underside is a darker shade of charcoal so gives a little contrast to the cuffed sleeves. And the snaps are fvcking next level, it takes a fairly close inspection to see the color variations, but fits the shirt perfectly. I'd like to see tiger eyed agates and other cool stones used--obsedian?--in different western shirts. I recommend this shirt, for sure; and now I'm convinced the grey herringbone WILL be mine too  |
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 4, 2016 17:44:25 GMT -6
So you recommend it? What's the fabric like? Yeah that label is definitely maroon, not red. I have the same label on one of my IH Chambrays. The fabric feels less substantial compared to the 134, probably because it lacks the herringbone pattern, so it feels thinner. It still has visual appeal, in that the color is not monotone, but has lighter grey threads "heathered" in (?) The underside is a darker shade of charcoal so gives a little contrast to the cuffed sleeves. And the snaps are fvcking next level, it takes a fairly close inspection to see the color variations, but fits the shirt perfectly. I'd like to see tiger eyed agates and other cool stones used--obsedian?--in different western shirts. I recommend this shirt, for sure; and now I'm convinced the grey herringbone WILL be mine too Damn....I need to pick one up. They are going relatively quick on IHUK but still a few left. Wonder if RB is doing another restock... devastitis should be getting his soon too... |
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 17:51:00 GMT -6
The fabric feels less substantial compared to the 134, probably because it lacks the herringbone pattern, so it feels thinner. It still has visual appeal, in that the color is not monotone, but has lighter grey threads "heathered" in (?) The underside is a darker shade of charcoal so gives a little contrast to the cuffed sleeves. And the snaps are fvcking next level, it takes a fairly close inspection to see the color variations, but fits the shirt perfectly. I'd like to see tiger eyed agates and other cool stones used--obsedian?--in different western shirts. I recommend this shirt, for sure; and now I'm convinced the grey herringbone WILL be mine too Damn....I need to pick one up. They are going relatively quick on IHUK but still a few left. Wonder if RB is doing another restock... devastitis should be getting his soon too... For $150 this shirt is a smart investment in your style net worth |
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 17:52:53 GMT -6
IHSH-142 Large:
PtP >21.5
waist <20.5
shoulder >18
length >29
|
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Apr 4, 2016 17:55:04 GMT -6
IHSH-142 Large: PtP >21.5 waist <20.5 shoulder >18 length >29 XL should be money for me. |
|
|
|
Post by devastitis on Apr 4, 2016 17:55:16 GMT -6
IHSH-142 Large: PtP >21.5 waist <20.5 shoulder >18 length >29 I hope you have the greater and less than signs flipped.. |
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Apr 4, 2016 18:01:34 GMT -6
IHSH-142 Large: PtP >21.5 waist <20.5 shoulder >18 length >29 I hope you have the greater and less than signs flipped.. no, the signs are good; but the #'s are just slightly over, and just barely under. |
|
|
|
Post by devastitis on Apr 4, 2016 18:19:40 GMT -6
I hope you have the greater and less than signs flipped.. no, the signs are good; but the #'s are just slightly over, and just barely under. if it's just barely, I did good by not going L. We'll see how big or small the XL is. |
|
