Saw "The Hateful Eight" last night...

Yep, he comes in near the end. He's good.

Of course there's gore.  And "N" words galore.  It's QT, and that's his thing.  It's amazing though.
They're having more issues than planned for the 70mm in theaters.  It's hard to do, setup and expensive.  And it's not going well...

Hm, good to hear that it was good. I was curious about whether it would meet expectations. I loved every second of Django except for the over the top shootout. And IB was great, and definitely not as gory as other QT flicks.

It's not the presence of gore, rather the campy presentation that I'm taking issue with. Django had a much more serious tone throughout, to where even the campy director cameo scene didn't pull the whole tone of the film the wrong way (in my opinion). There was more gore in, say, Kill Bill Vol 1 than IB, but the gore turn his films took around KBv1 is something I haven't been overly fond of. KBv2 was far more subdued, and one of his better recent films. I really like Inglourious Basterds, don't get me wrong, there were just some choices I didn't dig. I was happy to see that he didn't go the same way with Django, even though there was still some camp. I have to watch IB again for specific examples, but that'll have to be after next week's Star Wars marathon.

after my last response, I'm actually wondering what movies you're basing this statement on. Right around (and a little bit in) Kill Bill is where QT started introducing a lot of camp tone into his films (even though Jackie Brown is an homage to exploitation films, it really doesn't get campy), and then Deathproof is severely campy with a couple gory scenes, and then every violent scene in IB is campy gore, which I felt worked against the overall tone of the overall film. I felt that he scaled back the camp in Django, and now we're onto H8. I don't know if these are popular opinions, though I have noticed a lot more people accuse him of being a hack after the Kill Bill shift in his style.

I guess it's also worth mentioning I'm not a fan of From Dusk til Dawn, which, even though it's Robert Rodriguez, a lot of people equate as a QT film since he wrote the screenplay, and it does have a lot of gore and camp. This film isn't considered in my analysis.

I'm gonna try to see it in 70mm, but I think the Alamo near me only has 35mm (saw Interstellar projected from film which was pretty cool -- my digital accustomed eyes had totally forgotten the film experience). I saw Branagh's Hamlet projected in 70mm back in the day, but I doubt they still have the equipment at that theater since it's been so long.

Here's hoping that having Kasdan involved gives Empire a run for it's money. The last time I watched Episode II I skipped over most of the stuff on Naboo, made it about 30 minutes shorter and 50% more enjoyable. I actually liked III up until the point where Lucas decided it needed to be an homage to the original Universal Frankenstein. Fingers crossed that, even if we can't get a non-special edition remastered in 4k for Blu-ray (which would make me so happy), we can at least get the pre-Episode III version of Jedi out of Disney at some point. Adding NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO to Jedi takes a major dramatic point in the series and makes it a silly joke. I'm so mad at George Lucas sometimes.

Yeah, the campy gore aspect clears it up. KB certainty had more and From Dusk til Dawn was all camp all the time.

Of course Natural Born Killers being mostly camp and Reservoir Dogs, Killing Zoe, Pulp Fiction and True Romance being more straight, less camp.

He is.  One of my fave's for sure.  I can't help but think that the role Tim Roth got was made for CW.  But Roth did a great job and frankly, it's probably good to have CW not there as to keep too much Django from entering your mind...
Both are great actors.

Yeah, I get that, but it's sort of outside of my point, which I'm sure you understand. I'd just like to see something officially sanctioned that acknowledges constant revision is not a sound policy. If you can't make your story fit without adding shit to the original, then you're doing a poor job of writing your prequel or sequel story. I'm glad Spielberg never got in this habit, but the dude is too busy to really consider going backwards. I don't want a version of Indiana Jones where the guy is doing fancy shit with the swords and then has to pull out a gun before Indy can draw on him. It's not a matter of preserving my childhood so much as it shows how weak Lucas got as a filmmaker through lack of practice. You can't go back and say that's always what you intended when it was never in your script. 

I'm boycotting that turd. I'll watch it boot legged or free but I won't pay for his stuff.