|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Oct 31, 2014 23:20:39 GMT -6
JOSH GUSTIN asked this question on Style Forum about 3 hrs ago so if u want to be heard go over there. Kind of like a father who is a HS Football coach but wont show his own son how to throw or catch a foozball. I am surprised that question wont be asked to anyone in the live feed
Question for the group: what else can we make for you?
I have a long mental list but I'd love know what you're into these days (and I like a challenge).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2014 23:27:02 GMT -6
Well I'll be damned. Seems like they just dislike us.
|
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Oct 31, 2014 23:32:45 GMT -6
JOSH GUSTIN asked this question on Style Forum about 3 hrs ago so if u want to be heard go over there. Kind of like a father who is a HS Football coach but wont show his own son how to throw or catch a foozball. I am surprised that question wont be asked to anyone in the live feed Question for the group: what else can we make for you?
I have a long mental list but I'd love know what you're into these days (and I like a challenge). Well, they can't make the current season of Engineered Garments, so... That might be inappropriate, but I don't know, this group has been through this with them already, they've shown they're not interested. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2014 23:37:51 GMT -6
Well in all fairness, if they can sell the SF guys on their brand, that's better for them as a company. Those guys fit more in to what Gustin has shown us they want to be.
We are casual, no nonsense, "everyday guy" guys here. The SF guys are more medtrosexual, sex in the city, Italian loafers without socks, fixed gear bike riding, urban commuters.
|
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Oct 31, 2014 23:45:40 GMT -6
Well in all fairness, if they can sell the SF guys on their brand, that's better for them as a company. Those guys fit more in to what Gustin has shown us they want to be. We are casual, no nonsense, "everyday guy" guys here. The SF guys are more medtrosexual, sex in the city, Italian loafers without socks, fixed gear bike riding, urban commuters. Fair enough. Still stings to see her running around town with another dude. In any event, this should be a good preview. I'm starting to sound like a jealous ex-boyfriend. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 0:04:02 GMT -6
Well I'll be damned. Seems like they just dislike us. No shit. Whoever surprise by it needs more life experience. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 0:10:22 GMT -6
Well I'll be damned. Seems like they just dislike us. No shit. Whoever surprise by it needs more life experience. The surprise wasn't for the dislike. It was for the "we're gonna post this up over here and pretend like y'all won't see it". |
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Nov 1, 2014 1:10:12 GMT -6
JOSH GUSTIN asked this question on Style Forum about 3 hrs ago so if u want to be heard go over there. Kind of like a father who is a HS Football coach but wont show his own son how to throw or catch a foozball. I am surprised that question wont be asked to anyone in the live feed Question for the group: what else can we make for you?
I have a long mental list but I'd love know what you're into these days (and I like a challenge). This is all just so silly. With that over there, they lose the ability to moderate their users (running their community page, they would actually be in a position to verify purchase of complaining members, for example) and react appropriately. They lose direct access to their customers, and all the guys over there are asking the exact same questions. "Offer the other shirt fits, CPO with less pockets, flannel lined chinos and denim, western shirts with snaps, how do the shirts fit, what size should I order. " All these things used to be discussed at length on the community page weekly. If the Gustin forum was searchable, it'd be fairly easy to find them. |
|
|
|
Post by bugula on Nov 1, 2014 6:29:01 GMT -6
The SF guys are more medtrosexual, sex in the city, Italian loafers without socks, fixed gear bike riding, urban commuters. Hey. As a fixie rider and someone who doesn't give a damn how bushy my brows get nor have ever owned a pair of loafers, I take offense to that.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 6:30:35 GMT -6
The SF guys are more medtrosexual, sex in the city, Italian loafers without socks, fixed gear bike riding, urban commuters. Hey. As a fixie rider and someone who doesn't give a damn how bushy my brows get nor have ever owned a pair of loafers, I take offense to that. Lol, don't. Of that list, no single item alone is bad. It's the conglomeration of them all that makes it an insult |
|
|
|
Post by jray on Nov 1, 2014 7:03:45 GMT -6
this is funny stuff. I'm a cluster f#$k then. Suit and tie during the week working in the financial services industry. On weekends, I wear selvedge denim with workboots and shave with a DE razor. That makes me a what...............cool dude?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 7:11:11 GMT -6
this is funny stuff. I'm a cluster f#$k then. Suit and tie during the week working in the financial services industry. On weekends, I wear selvedge denim with workboots and shave with a DE razor. That makes me a what...............cool dude? Naked faced, boot wearing, bean-counter |
|
|
|
Post by bugula on Nov 1, 2014 7:29:24 GMT -6
Hey. As a fixie rider and someone who doesn't give a damn how bushy my brows get nor have ever owned a pair of loafers, I take offense to that. Lol, don't. Of that list, no single item alone is bad. It's the conglomeration of them all that makes it an insult Hahahahahah - notice I left out the Sex in the City piece. So 2 outta 4 - and SiC was all for a girl. |
|
|
|
Post by jray on Nov 1, 2014 7:31:17 GMT -6
Untucked - I'm going with that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 8:28:40 GMT -6
The SF guys are more medtrosexual, sex in the city, Italian loafers without socks, fixed gear bike riding, urban commuters. Hey. As a fixie rider and someone who doesn't give a damn how bushy my brows get nor have ever owned a pair of loafers, I take offense to that. haha...was going to post something very similar. |
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Nov 1, 2014 9:58:55 GMT -6
Lol, don't. Of that list, no single item alone is bad. It's the conglomeration of them all that makes it an insult Hahahahahah - notice I left out the Sex in the City piece. So 2 outta 4 - and SiC was all for a girl. Alright, I'll say it. Sex in the City was, for the most part, a damn good show. I got into it at the behest of Wifebert, who was still just Special Ladyfriendbert at the time, but I won't claim that I didn't genuinely enjoy it. If nothing else, Mr. Big was a great role model. |
|
|
|
Post by ickes on Nov 1, 2014 11:29:50 GMT -6
Mattbert....this is me not liking your post....where's the thumbs down button? I'm going to pretend you didn't post this 
|
|
|
|
Post by Mattbert on Nov 1, 2014 11:37:00 GMT -6
Mattbert....this is me not liking your post....where's the thumbs down button? I'm going to pretend you didn't post this Come on! I dare you to not be amused by this. |
|
|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 1, 2014 12:06:57 GMT -6
I am watching Sex & the City right now. We just finished watching the episode where the girl falls out of the window after she just had an epic meltdown lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 12:57:33 GMT -6
Hahahahahah - notice I left out the Sex in the City piece. So 2 outta 4 - and SiC was all for a girl. Alright, I'll say it. Sex in the City was, for the most part, a damn good show. I got into it at the behest of Wifebert, who was still just Special Ladyfriendbert at the time, but I won't claim that I didn't genuinely enjoy it. If nothing else, Mr. Big was a great role model. For guys, there are things that should not be shared. This is probably one of it.  |
|
|
|
Post by jeffrx on Nov 1, 2014 13:14:55 GMT -6
Guys, Josh has been on Styleforum for quite a while. He posts stuff there a decent amount. I would not take it as a statement against "us".
|
|
|
|
Post by stinky on Nov 1, 2014 13:27:02 GMT -6
Guys, Josh has been on Styleforum for quite a while. He posts stuff there a decent amount. I would not take it as a statement against "us". Be that as it may, THEY HAVE THEIR OWN F*CKING FORUM. For the life of me, I can't understand why they don't at least post the very same question on a forum that they own and host that, despite occasional grumblings over quality and sizing issues, is still frequented by people who still buy their products regularly. It's not just that he (and Stephen) don't post things like this in the weargustin community, they actively avoid it. |
|
|
|
Post by Dirty_Denim on Nov 1, 2014 13:43:11 GMT -6
Guys, Josh has been on Styleforum for quite a while. He posts stuff there a decent amount. I would not take it as a statement against "us". Actually the more I think about it the more I understand why he posted that there. Gustin is paying to be able to use Style Forum as a place to advertise & speak to a wider non Gustin forum. Affiliate brands pay to be able to post openly on there. Should he ask that question in his own forum..sure but Gustin is getting cooler by the day & by cooler I mean acceptable as a legit brand . I think they shed their KS image & they are running with it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2014 15:06:43 GMT -6
Guys, Josh has been on Styleforum for quite a while. He posts stuff there a decent amount. I would not take it as a statement against "us". Actually the more I think about it the more I understand why he posted that there. Gustin is paying to be able to use Style Forum as a place to advertise & speak to a wider non Gustin forum. Affiliate brands pay to be able to post openly on there. Should he ask that question in his own forum..sure but Gustin is getting cooler by the day & by cooler I mean acceptable as a legit brand . I think they shed their KS image & they are running with it. I tend to agree with this, and have seen the attitude towards Gustin on SF and Reddit warm up over the last several months. I'd of course like to see more participation on the G forums from Josh, Stephen, or even Cody... but it's not like any of us are quiet about what we want to see. It's not a question that needs to be asked on their own forum because it's always filled with requests, suggestions, and wishful thinking (that mostly goes completely ignored or implemented in a watered down fashion). |
|
|
|
Post by exophobe on Nov 1, 2014 15:11:53 GMT -6
Actually the more I think about it the more I understand why he posted that there. Gustin is paying to be able to use Style Forum as a place to advertise & speak to a wider non Gustin forum. Affiliate brands pay to be able to post openly on there. Should he ask that question in his own forum..sure but Gustin is getting cooler by the day & by cooler I mean acceptable as a legit brand . I think they shed their KS image & they are running with it. I tend to agree with this, and have seen the attitude towards Gustin on SF and Reddit warm up over the last several months. I'd of course like to see more participation on the G forums from Josh, Stephen, or even Cody... but it's not like any of us are quiet about what we want to see. It's not a question that needs to be asked on their own forum because it's always filled with requests, suggestions, and wishful thinking (that mostly goes completely ignored or implemented in a watered down fashion). My point is more focused on them asking the question there, and 90% of this stuff has been begged for in their own forum for months and months. |
|
