|
IHSH-33
Apr 13, 2016 14:45:51 GMT -6
Post by wdw on Apr 13, 2016 14:45:51 GMT -6
Interesting. I've just compared my black and indigo 33s, both L. The black was new and I warm soaked it once. The indigo second-hand was soaked to take out shrinkage, allegedly. Don't know the exact details of that, but may have been washed or soaked more for all I know.
Anyway, both are virtually identical when flat. If anything, the indigo is maybe a couple of mm wider. I wouldn't size up on the strength of that, but at least you can hot wash down, so no big deal. Better a bit too big than a bit too small.
|
|
|
IHSH-33
Apr 13, 2016 14:48:08 GMT -6
Post by disheveled on Apr 13, 2016 14:48:08 GMT -6
I'll get the tape for fun...
|
|
|
Post by bentin on Apr 13, 2016 14:50:08 GMT -6
Better a bit too big than a bit too small. Giles will have your head!
|
|
|
IHSH-33
Apr 13, 2016 14:59:43 GMT -6
Post by disheveled on Apr 13, 2016 14:59:43 GMT -6
Large indigo: ptp: 22.25 shoulder: 18.25 waist: 20.75 length: 30
Med black: ptp: 21.5 17.5 20 30
|
|
|
IHSH-33
Apr 13, 2016 15:24:09 GMT -6
Post by wdw on Apr 13, 2016 15:24:09 GMT -6
Ok, in the interests of science:
Large indigo: ptp 22.5 Shoulder: 18.25 Waist: 20.75 Length: 29.5
Large black: ptp: 22.5 Shoulder: 18.25 Waist: 20.75 Length: 30
Looks like the Large's are pretty consistent, all within 0.25 of IHUK ptp and minimal shrinkage elsewhere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2016 16:17:37 GMT -6
So, from what I seem to recall, they are 2 different denims... They aren't the same denim in different colors, I think
|
|
|
Post by disheveled on Feb 22, 2017 13:28:28 GMT -6
|
|